Jump to content

Talk:Contrasting and categorization of emotions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

wonder, awe?

[edit]

i was curious as to whether wonder and/or awe are considered emotions. wonder appears on one list, awe on none. are there any other lists of emotions not yet included that do include awe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.203.239 (talk) 19:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Table Content / Contrasting Basic Emotions

[edit]

This table should not be changed unless parts are shown to conflict with common knowledge. It should be discussed here in the first instance. Removed "dreadfullness" which is not the name of an emotion (and fear is already in the table). Also restored a row that seems to have been accidentally removed by the dreadfulness contributer. Given the initial point also removed the sentence inviting users to amend the table. Ultimâ (talk) 12:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page issues

[edit]

There does not appear to be any disputes or discussions about missing information so it seems the tags were removed. Lower tables may need extended descriptions.Ultimâ (talk) 22:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Contrasting and categorization of emotions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Small Error in Plutchik's wheel image

[edit]

Dear All -- The image of Plutchik's wheel has a small error in it. The border emotion between sadness and surprise should be "DISAPPOINTMENT", it should not be "disapproval". If you look at the factor analysis of 40 emotional words (figure 1.2, page 18 in [1]), the word DISAPPOINTMENT is halfway between "sad" and "bewildered", while "disapproval" does not appear in his selected list of 40 emotions. However, "dissatisfied" does appear, next to "disgusted". Disappointment can also be found in table 3 (page 120 in [2]). It also makes intuitive sense that the opposite of "optimism" is disappointment, not disapproval. Unfortunately, this error has been propagated throughout the internet based on this slightly flawed image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.51.205 (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a different view given a different reference from Plutchik. Please see [3] page 349 figure 6. In Plutchik's own article he shows the wheel and the word disapproval is used. Since that reference is 10 years after the previous reference one can infer that Plutchik means to use 'disapproval'. Personally, I like disappointment better, but we are supposed to be a reference source, right? McAugustine (talk) 22:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I put my first disagreement on 18 March and signed it. If you look at the references and pull up the image on the wayback machine then you can quite clearly see the wheel says disapproval. I don't understand why the unsigned user 86.132.51.205 says differently. It's been more than a week. I'm going to make my change again. I don't know what will happen, but if a bot refers me back to this meta page then I guess I'll get to learn about Wikipedia escalation procedures.McAugustine (talk) 04:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information. I have purchased and reviewed [4] (same as reference 2). On page 113 Chapter 8 figure 2 the eight primary emotions have 'sorrow' in place of 'sadness'. Then on page 118 "surprise + sorrow = embarrassment, disappointment". From this I conclude that 'disappointment', like 'sorrow' was an earlier term. As this 1991 source material does not contain the eight petaled structure with three levels of intensity that are discussed in the article and the 2001 American Scientist article does contain the picture and uses the word 'sadness' not 'sorrow' and 'disapproval' not 'disappointment' then the most accurate wiki article would have to say 'disapproval' also. In addition, the table 3 comment from the unsigned contributor above is not convincing. There are many words used in that table that do not end up in Plutchik's wheel and dyads and triads notably: fatalism, resignation, pride, and alarm. McAugustine (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Plutchik, Robert. "A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion." Theories of emotion 1 (1980): 3-31.
  2. ^ Plutchik, Robert. The emotions. University Press of America, 1991.
  3. ^ American Scientist July-August 2001
  4. ^ The Emotions, Robert Plutchik, University Press of America, 1991 which is also listed as copyright 1962 and 1990 Random House

untitled

[edit]
Can anyone provide additional verifiable source for the emotion combos, like textbooks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.2.171.87 (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Contrasting and categorization of emotions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

some thing new

[edit]

http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/psychology/27-categories-emotion-05212.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.184.186.162 (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emotion Classification

[edit]

Is this article the list version of Emotion classification? Or should these two articles be merged? ParticipantObserver (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Contrasting_and_categorization_of_emotions&oldid=1198431594"